|
Bingo Pinballs
This page was created on 7-29-2011
|
|
|
|
|
Someone in California _ Needed to convert their Triple Plays
to “one coin” play!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now what the “f**k” did that mean _ Did it mean that they
“completely locked out any change that multiple coins would
have” and instead “made the bingo increase all odds and
features as though multiple coins where played” even
though the player would only insert one-coin,
??????
“Random features and Odds to still get players to play” yet,
met the needs of the law, “that extra coins would do nothing”
??????
“Yes, I think so _ In fact, I think that this was very
likely and very well thought out and ingenious!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now this “is a 5-cent letter sent from San Francisco, California
to San Bruno, California _ “Over United Bingos”
OK, you know my theory: “United owned California” _ So what
were the “mob ties” for them in those days???
Who was “AA Sales Co.” and how did they play into this
scenario???
|
|
|
|
|
And, this is a very extensive modification, so likely it was
“made to hold the players attention and still make the machine an earning
bingo!”
So, likely “a bingo expert was involved” in dedicating these
changes _ Who – Lyn Dyrant himself?
Did these changes stem all the way back to Chicago and were
interpreted and passed on?
“Extra Balls were a Contention on the Pixies?” _ It has been
alluded too several times that the Uniteds gave away their features too
easily!!
“Did combining both these directions in the letter” mean that
the Pixies also needed the “one coin mod” ??
~ I love this Stuff ~
Associated Links
http://danny.cdyn.com/k132a.htm
|